Perspective

Recently, I have been considering how my perspective is so fundamentally changed on certain things, just by virtue of a change in location. Now, the snarkist in me will of course pipe up with the observation that this is all a change in perspective is. But that is beside the point, and that part of me is an insufferable ass.

Take Starbucks, for example.

In the States, I always felt slightly oppressed by Starbucks. They were everywhere, they all charged money for wifi, their environments were uniformly bland and sterile, and their coffee was -- more often than not -- just plain bad. This isn't referring to their cream-sugar-ice-coffee concoctions, which are probably just as tasty as the combination might suggest, but their plain black iced coffee, which is what I always drank. It was consistently bitter, sour, and served with way too much ice along with a bad attitude, as if I was being marginalized for not purchasing a double-caramel-pumpkin-chocolate-macchiato with an extra shot of some hideous candy syrup.

So I tended to avoid Starbucks, heading for the usual hipster hangouts and smaller chains, where the coffee was cheaper and arguably higher quality, and the atmosphere was friendlier.

Here in China, though, the situation is reversed. Starbucks is the single store I know where I can consistently get fast free wifi and a good cheap cup of coffee.

Yes, the iced coffee is still bitter and sour, but it's actually iced coffee, rather than the normal hot coffee poured over a couple ice cubes, resulting in a cup of warm coffee-flavored water.

Yes, the environment is bland and sterile, but here I don't have intermittent high pressure fronts of cigarette smoke drifting into my airspace from nearby tables, or sweaty waitresses hovering over me while I consider which of their overpriced drinks to buy.

At one notable joint, I ranged through half of their coffee menu, being told with each order that that particular drink was not available. When I finally asked what they did have available, I was helpfully informed that their coffee machine was, in fact, broken.

In a fit of unbridled optimism, they suggested I order tea.

This is the suggestion of someone who has absolutely misunderstood the nature of caffeine addiction.CIMG0001 I replied that, while I appreciated their enterprising nature, someone looking for a cheap cup of coffee would be hard pressed to order a 50RMB pot of tea. In despair, I finally ordered a Coke, which arrived in a warm can, and on leaving I was charged 15RMB… a fair price for a quick lunch (for example, a bbq pork set meal from the neighborhood Cantonese restaurant), but a far cry from the normal 4-5RMB price for a can of soda.

So. The only consistent factor in these shops is inconsistency. Thus, whereas the green medusa or mermaid or whatever it is of Starbucks in the States is a figure of cold, unbending corporate conformity, here it shines like a welcome beacon of reliability.

The fact that I can fill up my thermos with iced coffee for 13RMB (15, minus 2 for having my own cup -- something Chinese places aren't starting to do yet) doesn't hurt either. Normally a cup of coffee anywhere starts at 20, since they all tend to just make espresso even if you just want plain brew/drip.

92dca3bc-0612-4561-ab8e-3da63a79aaeb And before I start sounding like an overly picky hobo with a slightly nicer version of a tin cup, let me just say it's not only about price.

This was confirmed a few days ago, when I discovered a Carl's Jr. in Shanghai by way of a giant ad placed on the elevators servicing my gym. I spent about 45 minutes on the elliptical with that goddamn Famous Star drifting in and out of my eyeline. Afterwards I showered, changed, and after a few minutes of internal debate, blew half a red bill (100/2 = 50RMB) on a Double-western Bacon Cheeseburger combo.

Oh... and go ahead and super size that, too.

The point, obviously, wasn't the price ( 50RMB is about how much I typically spend on food in 3 days ) or the food -- though the faint nausea I felt upon seeing the burger didn't stop me from eating it -- but the momentary sense of familiarity. In a surprising departure from the normal Chinese business model, Carl's Jr. even has the familiarly enormous paper buckets that masquerade as beverage cups, and a self-serve drinks fountain. They even have a little salsa bar with pickled banana peppers and salsa fresca.

In fact, it was almost like being at a Carl's Jr. in the U.S., except nobody there was openly weeping or picking at cold sores.

I think the fundamental reality is that I am, in fact… kinda homesick.

Not what I would normally call "homesick," really, but in a kind of low-level, almost unconscious sense of the word. I'm not depressed or forlorn, but put a little plastic tub of KFC mashed potatoes in front of me and there's a little rush of endorphins that might not have been triggered had I been offered a far superior Chinese meal.

And now, since my laptop battery's almost done and I may be off to some music pub in Xujiahui (徐家汇), it's random picture time.

-------------------------

Friends Ellen and Roger; Ellen's been previously introduced, Roger is a fellow American here doing kind of similar work as I am, freelancing as a videographer. Also looking (or just got, I've forgotten which) teaching jobs. Also, how is it that my Nokia phone is better at exposing night pictures than my Casio digicam? Damn you, Hong Kong.

图像0168

Jishnu, this one's for you… an entire store dedicated exclusively to selling frozen mochi. This is one of two display shelves with all kinds of flavors.

图像0177

This sounds simultaneously like a delicious treat and an STD.

图像0178

7/1/2010: Lotus Land

"Holy crap, this is good," she mumbled through a mouth full of chicken makhani.

Sunshine, as she likes to be called ( yang guang / 阳光 ), reached out with her spoon for more.

"It's not soup!" Ellen and I advised her, after watching her inhale about four spoonfuls of the rich curry while using her naan as a trencher. "You can actually try eating some of the bread too, it's quite good with the sauce."

She poked at the now soggy piece of dough doubtfully for a moment, then picked up her spoon with a determined set to her features.

"I like the sauce," she announced, resuming the attack.

-------------

It's actually not very often that I get to eat a nice meal out in Shanghai.

The problem is not that there is a shortage of excellent restaurants (decidedly not the case, contrary to my initial impression), nor that all the places worth eating at are inhumanly expensive (only by Chinese working class standards). It's simply that, given my schedule, my meals normally consist of something grabbed for 2 to 3 RMB on the street when I happen to remember that I'm hungry, a banana I've been carrying around in my man-purse for the last two days, or a set meal from whatever fast food place is most convenient to where I happen to be working that day.

That, and my friends are equally busy, and I'm not about to make the effort to go somewhere nice on my own.

CIMG0020

Demeter, a store that sells only fragrances (NY and Shanghai). 300+ varieties, including snow, wood, salt water, and grass.

Tonight, by that mysterious temporal alchemy from which the most satisfying social encounters spring, my friend Sunshine was in Shanghai for a kind of hostel owners' conference, and my friend Ellen had the evening free. I decided to take Sunshine down to one of the more famous art/shopping districts, Tianzifang (田子坊). Sometimes also known as Taikang Road ( taikang lu / 泰康路 ), it is one of those historically funky, atmospheric areas where artists gathered to open small boutiques to sell and display their sculptures, paintings, crafts, and food. With increasing numbers of tourists in Shanghai, and the general increase of the city's wealth, it has developed in recent years to become more of a tourist attraction, with a higher proportion of foreign visitors than local, and a corresponding increase in prices and premium brand chain stores.

So the local artists have generally moved on to cheaper, dingier pastures, while more profitable cafes, wine bars, and restaurants tend to fill their places alongside the brand-name boutique stores.

While a disappointment to many local Shanghainese, it remains an interesting place to take a visitor to the city, and a great place to find a good quality Western meal -- albeit at a price premium.

After window shopping for a while with Sunshine, Ellen showed up on the 9 train and we settled into a routine that I've found remains virtually the same regardless of your location: deciding where to eat. Eventually, I discovered that Sunshine had never tried Indian food, so thinking that the heavily spiced Indian fare would agree with her central Chinese palate, we made our way back to Lotus Land.

We were greeted briskly but politely, and invited upstairs. Following the maitre'd, we sidled through a crush of servers and patrons, up a narrow staircase, and into a swirling room full of golden light, dark wood, cardamon, and cumin. We were seated quickly at one of the corner tables, lounging on cushions on the raised platform, and placed our order after fifteen minutes of watching our waiter desperately scrambling out of the weeds.

Sunshine having never eaten Indian food, and Ellen having no particular preference, the ordering was down to me; I picked a few traditional favorites that should be fairly safe, and give Sunshine a good introduction to Indian flavors: chicken makhani / butter chicken, a vegetable biryani, palak paneer, aloo gobi, and a couple of naan.

CIMG0025

Delicious... but where's my cauliflower, dammit?

The aloo gobi appeared first, and on its arrival the meal could still have gone either way; the potatoes were crisp on the outside and tender inside, dusted with aromatics, and glistening with clarified butter. We all took a bite and then let our forks lay still, waiting for the rest of the food. It was perfectly seasoned and delicious, but… there was none of the expected cauliflower anywhere in this dish. Cauliflower being a fairly expensive ingredient in China, I could understand why, but it didn't bode well for the rest of the meal if the chef was cutting corners like these.

The chicken makhani appeared next, and all my doubts dissolved in the creamy, nutty, heavily spiced gravy and fork-tender chicken. I breathed a sigh of relief, and smiled when I heard Sunshine's amazed "holy crap!" ( wa sai / 哇塞 ) after her first taste. I was pleasantly surprised to find that the chef had actually used cashews as the thickener instead of cornstarch.. those aren't cheap.

This was the one I was worried about most. Things like butter and cream, which share center stage in this dish, are not quite the staples in China that they are in countries with thriving dairy traditions, so in many restaurants there is a marked lack of creaminess in cream dishes, or butteriness in butter dishes. Most Chinese bakeries' cakes lack body and depth of flavor because they simply replace much of the butter with vegetable or soy oil, and jack up the sugar content to compensate. On the other end of the scale, when a chef (pastry or otherwise) does get free reign with dairy products, they often go overboard -- I once had a slice of 'cheesecake' that was literally just a wedge of cream cheese on a sponge cake crust.

Next up was the palak paneer. The flavour was rich and deep, with a maddeningly elusive smoky undertone that I couldn't quite place. The cheese was real palak, firm and mild, and not the random cheese substitution so common in China (Sunshine had once asked me if I knew how to make pizza… when I told her I had everything I needed but cheese, she promptly presented me with a five-pound block of swiss cheese).

I reverted to my normal mode of eating Indian food; each bite a scoop of curry on a slice of naan. Looking over at Sunshine, I saw her plate was a single dejected piece of naan, slowly sinking into a gradually homogenizing mire of orange and green sauces. There was definitely a faint manic gleam in her eye as she plied her spoon, and the tip of her tongue poking out of the corner of her mouth as she reached out for another bite of butter chicken was just the perfect finishing touch.

Ellen, laughing at us both, was probably the most civilized of us all, dipping a spoon demurely into the curries while Sunshine and I attacked each dish with single-minded ferocity.

The biryani, last to arrive, was a pleasant if unexceptional variation. In truth, I think its only failing was in comparison with the spectacular curries on either side.

We passed a happy hour and a half, lovingly soaked up every last smear of curry with biryani and naan, and adding our own laughter to the happy and blessedly smoke-free atmosphere.

Sunshine is fairly typical of most Chinese I've met, in that she's -- at least initially -- not terribly eager to try new kinds of food. Chinese food is steeped in thousands of years of tradition, which I think may tend to stifle their culinary imagination somewhat.

I've seen a few food competitions here, which purport to pit the best chefs of China against each other. Each one of their dishes has been done a million times before, and there is a clear reluctance to try something daring and new. So many of these competitions essentially become beauty contests, to see which chef can make the best looking radish rosettes, or carve the most elegant turnip swan. The food itself is reduced to a formula; the recipes are so exactly known that there are no surprises there; it is either right or wrong.

CIMG0027

Left: Ellen. Right: Sunshine.

So it is endless gratifying when I can introduce my friends here to something genuinely new; whether or not they like it (Jing Jing was not overly fond of her first taste of a Big Mac), I can almost see their borders expanding, and they're always just a little more willing or eager to try the next thing.

At any rate, Lotus Land was a resounding success. The food was well executed, the atmosphere was better than most, and the company was superb.

2 curries, vegetable biryani, 2 naan, and aloo gobi: 197RMB / $29 US

------------------------------

Lotus Land
2nd floor, Tianzifang #12, 274 Taikang Road
泰康路274弄田子坊12号2楼 近瑞金二路
+86 021-54652743

------------------------------

 

Random picture time:

My housemate Christina was temporarily kicked out by her (temporary) roommate Marina who was making an early night of it, so she decided to nest on the window seat in my room and surf the net for a while. I told her she looked like a tiny prostitute living in a garbage dump, which she took with great good humour.

Incidentally, she's from Wuhan, speaks fluent English, just arrived from Beijing to see what this Shanghai business is all about, and is a web designer (I think). Apparently she just got an invitation to compete in some kind of beauty contest, so now she's going to the gym every day, researching runway walks, and checking out clothes online. But she still eats microwaved hot dogs and Orion cakes (the local equivalent of Hostess' cupcakes) for breakfast.

Whenever I bring this up, she waves a hand impatiently at me and walks away.

CIMG0037

China trade

I know from this post and my last one, it might seem like I just hate everything right now, but it's not really true. I'm just having fun analyzing stuff and ranting lately. Also having discussions here with fellow Americans about the subject is triggering some weird thought processes. Lots and lots of tangents in this one.

I'm planning to completely cut myself off from all news and ADD-style entertainment though, so I should be back to more introspective type stuff soon.

--------------------------

China's current position in the global economy strikes me as similar to their position in the mid-17th century. It's largely one sided; goods flow out of China, and money flows in.

This applies more so to the Western world, and less so to the current third world, since China's investment in Africa has been staggering -- almost as if they're cultivating an economic successor. After all, as the Chinese middle class grows, they're going to need somewhere to make cheap products to buy too. With Chinese labor costs going up, that's certainly not going to be in the factory down the road.

A little bit of history first, I guess. In the mid 1700s, the British empire was going bankrupt because of its subjects' insatiable demand for Chinese tea, silk, and porcelain. The problem was that the British made nothing the Chinese wanted (except nice guns, cannons, and ships, which the British naturally wouldn't sell). So the only thing Britain could pay with was silver. And since they were on a gold standard, they were really paying with borrowed silver.

And so goods flowed from China to Britain, and money flowed from Britain to China, and Britain gradually sunk into greater and greater debt.

Sound familiar?

Britain's solution to the problem was simple, elegant, and well… kind of evil: opium. They grew copious amounts of opium in India, started importing it to China, and with an instant repeat customer base of addicted Chinese, the flow of silver reversed.

This of course was unacceptable to the Qing dynasty -- better known as the very last one -- and so to put it shortly, many people died, and China has had a bigass chip on its shoulder ever since.

The fundamental issue is this:

If you're competing in a global economy, you have between 1/5 and 1/6 of the world's population, you are largely in direct and authoritative control of their access to information and goods, and your economy is generally self-sufficient, congratulations: you are now playing on God mode.

Your population doesn't need, want, or even know about anything the outside world is producing (even if they're busily doing so in the factory across the street). On the other hand, you have the ability to make or buy whatever you or anyone else needs or wants, at a lower price than anyone else can.

Once you've been doing that for a while, you now have all the money, and can do pretty much whatever you want on the economic front.

This is what China was doing in the mid-1700s, and this is pretty much what we're seeing now. Back then, the short-term solution for Britain was opium. The slightly longer term solution was to blast the hell out of anything within reach of their cannons, sail a little farther along the coast and do it a few more times… then force China to sign a series of humiliating treaties that put things on a more even keel.

Now, there's really no alternative.

So what's to be done?

Well, looking around at the people here in China, the only thing that they're really hell-bent on importing (aside from iPhones) is Western culture (and I guess iPhones kind of count for that too). Movies, music, video games, software, and brands.

The problem is, nobody but the rich pays for any of it. Any movie is instantly available on DVD out on the street a day or so after it's released in theaters, or for streaming on any of several free services. Any music is available for download or streaming, complete with karaoke-style subtitles. Video games and software are of course downloadable, or you can buy them on disc for at any computer market for basically the cost of the disc. Anything copiable is copied and sold for vastly lower prices, and/or with more Chinese-centric features.

And brands? A pair of Levi's jeans will cost you about $200-250 in a high end shopping mall. Next door or in the basement, you can buy a pair of knockoffs for $10. And I'm told that even in the name brand stores, a good portion (estimates vary, but I've heard anywhere from 50 to 100%) of the inventory are knockoffs, purchased by the branch/city/regional managers to resell and pad their own bottom line.

baidu Google showed up; and Baidu appeared in 2000. Now Google's pulled out of China, and everyone uses Baidu. Does that website on the right look a little familiar?

America's biggest export to China is creativity and lifestyle. Trouble is, those things are easily duplicated, and nobody has the nerve to go to the Chinese government and say "hey, you know… if you paid us something for all this stuff, or enforced some laws here and there, we would all be a little bit richer for the exchange." In truth, everyone in the U.S. is probably too busy ripping MP3s and downloading movies to bother anyway.

Economists are forever complaining that the Chinese don't consume enough compared to their Western counterparts, who are forever running up credit card debt to buy that new gadget or handbag.

I'm pretty sure they're wrong.

Chinese consume plenty; the money just never ends up leaving China.

In a way, it's common sense; one could buy an iPhone for full retail price, or walk down to the local black market and buy a knockoff with the exact same look, and more or less the same functionality, for an eighth of the price.

It's a well-known trick for factories here:

  • Obtain a lucrative contract for a foreign product for, say, 100,000 units.
  • Run off your 100,000 units and deliver them, with a few thousand extra for possible manufacturing defects.
  • Switch to lower grade materials, run off another 50,000 to sell on the black market.
  • Pocket the proceeds.

A lot of people point to the undervalued Yuan as the reason; personally I think that's a little simplistic. I think I have it pretty well figured out; China's keeping the RMB undervalued while it develops Africa to service its coming consumer economy; once Africa starts producing, boom… RMB appreciates, imports are cheaper, and say hello to "Made in by China in Ethiopia" labels on everything you buy.

And after Ethiopia gets rich and starts looking around for people to make their iPhone 9Gs, maybe we'll be in a position to fire up our manufacturing industries again. Who knows… are global economies cyclical? There was always some "new world" out there before to give economic growth a new bump, or a global disaster/war to kill off a huge part of the population to effectively do the same thing. Could MRSA be the solution to our collective economic crises?

Anyway, It's a fundamentally different attitude. My girlfriend is usually puzzled when I show her the little doodads I buy from REI, or the other little things I bring back from the States with me. She steadfastly maintains that I'm a dumbass: Since I could buy essentially the same thing for a tenth of the price at the street market down the block, why would I even bother? She's absolutely amazed by the 100% guarantee REI offers; if it was here in China, she contends, the reaction would be swift and universal:

First, people would be skeptical and think whoever was in charge was a little crazy.

Second, once word got out, the store would be robbed blind and go out of business almost immediately.

There are a few things that either haven't made it to market here yet, or are simply out of reach for the majority of Chinese. Things like my Circulon Infinite omelet pan, with some fancy nonstick coating. The fact that I can fry an egg in this skillet without any oil is mind-blowing to JJ, whose impression of fried eggs has been cultivated by the technique commonly used in Wuhan restaurants: scramble them in a deep-fryer them until they just start to firm up, then scoop them out and throw them on a plate.

These pans would sell like mad over here… if a) people knew about them, and b) Chinese import taxes and price gouging didn't make them a $300 investment for a local. I paid $25 for this thing on Amazon. And I'm pretty sure if I looked hard enough, I'd find a "Made in China" stamp on it.

Another would be things like my Vibram FiveFingers. I get long stares from people on the street while wearing them, and everyone asks me about them; where I got them, how much they cost, and so on.

Just last week I found a photo of a factory in China churning out copies of these by the thousand.

The only reason they're still practically unheard of in China? The duplicators are making a killing off of eBay, selling to Americans looking for a deal on the hard-to-find shoes.

I think this will make it very, very difficult for anyone to do business with China in the coming years. What we have to offer them are soft and creative skills, where duplicating the results are a matter of more or less pushing a button. Meanwhile, China's education system is getting better, and its students are becoming more aware, analytical, and ever more ambitious.

Despite the tone of my previous post, I still believe in the States; as easy as it is to dismiss us as a collection of Krispy Kreme-sucking lard beasts, there is a certain flexibility of attitude, thought, and empathy that comes with being a nation built from without rather than exclusively from within, and it is difficult to adjust for that when you have about 30 centuries' worth of shared language, tradition, and history, and a more recent history -- several hundred years' worth -- of extreme isolationism.

And you know what? There's plenty of room for high quality American made products in a Chinese market; we just need labor unions to do the job they're supposed to do -- prevent abuse -- rather than try to milk every last dollar out of any organization silly enough to employ their members under the current arrangements.

There is a small but rapidly growing segment of the population here that is increasingly interested in conservation. This is something that has been lost in the recent breakneck race for capitalist profits, and doesn't show in the general population yet -- litter and pollution is omnipresent, and everything is disposable -- but people are starting to learn the value of (among other things) buying a high quality product once, rather than buying a cheap alternative that you have to replace every few months. So there's a small window of opportunity here, where U.S. products can insert themselves as premium, long-lasting brands in contrast to the local, more disposable products. As long as they're remotely affordabe, at any rate.

Though to be perfectly fair… Americans haven't really learned this lesson yet either, and we've had a hell of a lot longer with the reality. So maybe I'm just full of it and we just need to keep a tighter grip on our fricking money.

Facebook comment -> post: Politics

This was actually supposed to be a reply to a Facebook comment thread. I ended up deciding to make it my writing assignment o' the day, partly because I like how it sounds, and also because I'm working on this project that is such a time sink as to preclude me from writing any more today.

The thread so far:

G.G.G.: Thought I'd have some fun on america speaks out.com....here goes my first loony submission and its tortured logic ........The government regulating oil industries is ineffective, they have no expertise in the field, plus the free market is the ultimate regulator here. If anything the government should give the oil comp...anies further tax cuts to make the deep water oil extraction less

Jeff Yen: Well, looks like you're on track to be a Senator soon.

G.G.G.: I think Jack Nicholson said it best in as good as it gets, take away reason and accountability

Jeff Yen: You're on track to becoming a woman?

G.G.G.: a senator, given their reluctance to take a principled stand..on anything other campaign donations

And my response:

--------------------------

I actually disagree. I think their stand is in fact very principled, just principles of logic and economy as opposed to subjective values of morality and/or ethics. Simply put, they side with whomever benefits them the most.

The fact that they tend to line up with the lobbies and corporations is pretty logical; anyone who says they're going with "the people" are either a) lying, or b) operating on sentiment, which is equally dangerous. A political system shouldn't have to rely on pervasive dopamine imbalances in order to work the way it was meant to.

Take a look at Bhutan, which I see as a fascinating political experiment in progress. All of their current development and gains in what they call GNH are really down to one man, the previous king. Now that he's switched them over to a constitutional monarchy and abdicated, I'm pretty eager to see how that develops. It's not like they're all earthly saints or anything, but they're small and pretty self-contained, so I'm really looking forward to seeing how they're doing after they've been in charge of their own economy for a while.

I think the flaw in our republic, just as with the flaw in any form of communism, is that it is a system springing from the (sentimental) assumption that people operate in a certain way, or should, when everything we've ever done has shown that we do not.

The communist error was assuming people would be willing to work hard for the same money they'd get sleeping at home. I believe any democracy's error is assuming that given a choice between bettering society as a whole and benefiting ourselves -- or alternatively, punishing someone we dislike (which I would actually argue is the same thing) -- we will reliably choose the former.

It's taken longer for the U.S. system to be openly subverted than, say, the USSR, but it remains to be seen whether we'll last longer than the Roman republic (only 248 more years… come on guys, we can do it!). At any rate, I believe the underlying flaw remains: neither ideology sufficiently accounts for human venality. It's just a game to see who can keep a lid on it the longest.

In fact, we might actually owe our longevity as a political entity to the fact that Congressmen spend so much of their time campaigning and molesting their pages instead of working, which keeps them from fucking up the country quite as much.

Ultimately, there's no sufficient metric against which to objectively rate things like ethics or morality, so we can't say with any measure of authority: "Senator, we have observed with some concern that your behaviour is now comprised of 73% douchebaggery, so we're going to take you out back and Taser your genitals for a while."

Some of the more rabidly conservative Republicans would probably quite enjoy that, actually.

But without a system of regulation, and therefore correction, the only other option is to simply frontload the issue: make it more beneficial, on an individual level, for people to behave the way we want them to, rather than less beneficial for people to behave badly, but only if they're caught.

This would require a pretty sweeping set of changes, and our republic is set up partly to stonewall changes as much as possible, so systematic overhauls like that are unlikely to ever happen within the system. This is especially the case given that the general populace are largely non-participants, and the most active participants are exactly the kind you don't want anywhere near the system.

It might be easier if we, say, levied charges of treason against and actually prosecuted Congressmen who subverted our political system for personal gain, but... they themselves would have to pass the law first, and they'd be the ones sitting in judgment of each other.

So much for that.

So really, just like everyone else, I think we'll just get to choose one:
a) Civil war
b) Coup (military, political, or otherwise)
c) Slow peaceful decline, leading to breakup of the union
d) Revolution
e) All of the above

Not that I think this is necessarily a bad thing. The world will change as we know it, and there will be lots of suffering, but the race should learn as a whole, and maybe the next global superpower will be that much better.

Personally I'm kind of hoping for (c).... I think it'd be nice to be a citizen of the Californivegashingtoloradoregonewyorkawaiian empire.

We could even invite Texas along for the ride, if they promised to use our books.

A couple of Italians kid hacked the Space Race… this is officially the coolest thing I’ve read in a long time

http://www.forteantimes.com/features/articles/1302/lost_in_space.html

Then, on 28 November 1960, the Bochum space observatory in West Germany said it had intercepted radio signals which it thought might have been a satellite. No official announcement had been made of any launch.

“Our reaction was to immediately switch on the receivers and listen,” said Achille. After almost an hour of tuning in to static, the boys were about to give up when suddenly a tapping sound emerged from the hiss and crackle.

“It was a signal we recognised immediately as Morse code – SOS,” said Gian. But something about this signal was strange. It was moving slowly, as if the craft was not orbiting but was at a single point and slowly moving away from the Earth. The SOS faded into distant space.